What are the key features of debt collection in the EAEU?


Preliminary consultation from a lawyer with 15-25 years of experience

Debt Collection Across the Eurasian Economic Union: Legal Frameworks and Practical Strategies

Debt collection across the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is a critical aspect for businesses operating in Belarus, Russia, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan. Understanding the legal frameworks, procedural nuances, and cross-border enforcement mechanisms is essential for recovering debts efficiently. This article explores the debt collection processes in these jurisdictions, focusing on Belarusian legislation as the default reference while addressing international treaties and practical considerations for businesses.

How debt collection works in Belarus

In Belarus, debt collection is governed by the Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP), effective since January 1, 2026. The process typically begins with pre-trial negotiations, where creditors attempt to resolve disputes amicably. If unsuccessful, the creditor may file a lawsuit in the economic court. According to Article 196 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) adopted 01.01.2026, creditors must provide evidence of the debt, such as contracts, invoices, and payment records.  

The court examines the case and issues a decision, which can be enforced through state enforcement agencies. Enforcement measures include asset seizure, wage garnishment, and property auctions. Creditors should note that the statute of limitations for debt claims in Belarus is generally three years, as per Article 197 of the Civil Code.  

The cross-border aspects of debt collection in the EAEU

The EAEU facilitates cross-border debt collection through international treaties and conventions. The Minsk Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family, and Criminal Matters (1993) allows for the recognition and enforcement of court decisions among member states, including Belarus, Russia, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan.  

For example, a judgment issued by a Belarusian court can be enforced in Russia or Kazakhstan without re-examining the merits of the case, provided the decision complies with the procedural requirements of the enforcing state. Similarly, the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958) applies to arbitration awards, offering an alternative mechanism for cross-border disputes.  

The key differences in debt collection laws across EAEU countries

Country

Basic regulation

Key features of the process

Russia

1. Federal Law No. 229 is the main regulatory framework for debt collection through bailiffs.

2. Federal Law No. 230 focuses on the collection of debts from individuals.

3. Federal Law No. 151 regulates the activities of microfinance organizations, making it important for collecting microloan debts.

4. Federal Law No. 353 governs consumer lending practices.

5. Federal Law No. 102 specifically addresses mortgage regulations.

6. Federal Law No. 127 describes the bankruptcy procedures for individuals, sole proprietors, and organizations.

Additional Regulations include:

1. The Tax Code of the Russian Federation (July 31, 1998), which deals with tax-related debts, including fees and penalties.

2. The Code of Administrative Offenses (December 30, 2001), which pertains to the collection of administrative fines.

3. The Civil Procedure Code (June 11, 1964), outlining rules for court-based collections, including requirements for claims and complaints.

4. Arbitrazh Procedural Code of the Russian Federation No. 95-FZ of July 24, 2002 (as amended up to Federal Law No. 422-FZ of December 8, 2011)

5. The Housing Code (December 29, 2004), relevant to unpaid rent and utility bills and other various regulations that address specific types of obligations and debts.

The Federal Bailiff Service (FSSP) conducts enforcement proceedings. Bailiffs have extensive powers to search for accounts and property and can even impose travel bans on debtors. There is a well-developed auction system for selling seized property, allowing creditors to recover owed amounts more effectively.

Kazakhstan

1. The Law "On Collector Activity" (May 6, 2017, No. 62-VI) regulates the activities of collection agencies, including licensing, registration, and strict rules for interaction with debtors (e.g., prohibition of collecting debts without a contract, limits on calling times).

2. The Law "On Solvency Recovery and Bankruptcy of Citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan" (March 3, 2023) establishes procedures for citizens to declare bankruptcy or restructure debts.

3. The Law "On Banks and Banking Activity" (August 31, 1995, No. 2444) mandates that banks notify customers of loan delays within 30 days and allow 30 days for restructuring applications.

4. Civil Procedure Code (October 31, 2015, No. 377-V ZRK) regulates judicial debt recovery, including simplified written proceedings and issuance of court orders for debt collection.

In many cases, pre-trial settlements and mediation are actively encouraged. Court decisions are enforced immediately, which means that bailiffs can swiftly take action to seize assets when necessary.

Armenia

1. Civil Code of the Republic of Armenia (May 5, 1998) governs contractual obligations, setting the foundation for repayment terms, interest, and penalties.

2. Law on Bankruptcy (November 6, 2001) outlines procedures for debt restructuring or liquidation, including mandatory court application by creditors if a debtor’s assets are insufficient for repayment.

3. Law on Compulsory Enforcement of Judicial Acts (May 5, 1998) governs the process of seizing property, freezing assets, and enforcing court-ordered payments through the Compulsory Enforcement Service.

4. Civil Procedure Code (February 9, 2018) defines the legal framework for filing claims and obtaining judgments in court.

5. Law on Banking and Credit Organizations (June 22, 2002) governs debt recovery related to financial institutions, including rules on asset-backed securities and loan agreements.

Debt collection methods can be divided into judicial and non-judicial approaches. The initial step typically involves assessing the debtor's financial situation to identify the best course of action. Non-judicial collection usually focuses on negotiations with the debtor to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. If these negotiations fail, judicial procedures may be initiated, with court orders commonly used to enforce debts. It’s also important to remember that there are specific time limits for filing claims during the collection process, which must be strictly followed.

Kyrgyzstan

1. The Law of the Kyrgyz Republic on Bankruptcy (October 15, 1997, No. 74) regulates the overall bankruptcy process for individuals and entities, outlining rights and obligations.

2. The Decree of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic on the Order of Using Bankruptcy Process Procedures (December 30, 1998, No. 865) specifies the procedures to be followed during the bankruptcy process.

3. The Regulation on the Order of Appointment of Administrators by the Bankruptcy Authority (August 22, 2002, No. 584) defines the criteria and process for appointing bankruptcy administrators.

4. The Instruction on Reporting by Administrators (April 7, 2011, No. 143) outlines reporting requirements for administrators conducting bankruptcy procedures.

5. The Rules of Conducting Bankruptcy Proceedings (December 30, 1998, No. 865) details the conduct and operational protocols for managing bankruptcy cases.

Debt collection proceedings can be started with a notary's writ of execution. Like in other countries, bailiffs conduct searches and seizures of property and may also initiate bankruptcy proceedings against the debtor if needed.

Challenges of cross-border justice: Why it's difficult to collect debt in another jurisdiction

Despite the legal frameworks, enforcing debt collection decisions across EAEU countries can be challenging. Differences in procedural rules, language barriers, and bureaucratic delays often complicate the process. Additionally, debtors may attempt to hide assets or relocate to avoid enforcement. To overcome these challenges, creditors should work closely with local enforcement agencies and legal experts in the respective jurisdictions.  

Strategies for businesses to mitigate risks in cross-border debt collection

To minimize risks, businesses should adopt a proactive approach.

  • Draft Clear Contracts. Include detailed payment terms, dispute resolution clauses, and applicable law provisions.  
  • Conduct Due Diligence. Verify the financial stability and reputation of counterparties before entering into agreements.  
  • Use Arbitration. Opt for arbitration clauses in contracts to benefit from the New York Convention’s enforcement mechanisms.  
  • Seek Legal Expertise. Engage experienced legal professionals to navigate complex cross-border disputes.  

Law firm “Economic Disputes” specializes in providing legal support to businesses across the EAEU and beyond. Since 2019, our team of 15 experienced lawyers and specialists has successfully recovered 1.95 billion rubles for over 2,000 clients. Led by Director Sergey Belyavsky, a former judge with 20 years of experience in economic courts, we offer practical solutions tailored to your business needs. Our services include debt collection, arbitration, mediation, and cross-border dispute resolution.  

If your business needs legal support for debt collection or cross-border enforcement, submit a request. We will offer a realistic solution.

Have any questions?

Law firm.